17 años ayudando a las empresas argentinas
a elegir el mejor software
ProWorkflow
¿Qué es ProWorkflow?
Si la simplicidad es tan importante para ti como el conjunto de características, no busques más: esta es tu solución de gestión de proyectos. El valor real no es cuánto puede hacer este software, sino más bien cuánto se puede permitirte hacer como cliente. Ya sea que se trate de proyectos, tareas, tiempo o colaboración entre equipos, la solución realiza todo en un solo lugar, con una vista unificada.
Así que deja que esta empresa sea los engranajes para mantenerte en marcha y tú sé la persona creativa, para hacer lo que mejor sabes hacer, ¡crear!
¿Quién usa ProWorkflow?
Si la simplicidad y un conjunto de características sólido son importantes para ti, no busques más: esta es tu solución de gestión de proyectos. La gestión de proyectos, ¡simplificada! ¡Los proyectos, tareas, tiempo y colaboración son pan comido!
¿Tienes dudas sobre ProWorkflow?
Compara con una alternativa popular
ProWorkflow
Otras alternativas interesantes a ProWorkflow
Opinones de ProWorkflow
Pays for itself many times over
Comentarios: So much easier to make sure all time is billed. I love when myself and staff can fill a solid day with tracked time — lets me know nothing has been left on the table before billing. Capturing all of the time we spend on projects pays for the monthly PWF licence many times over. We are simply more profitable with this tool.
Puntos a favor:
Ability to organize projects any time from anywhere and delegate tasks effectively.
Contras:
Xero integration could be improved. It's not possible to make any changes to an invoice after it is sent to Xero. It would also be great to be able to categorize line items into Xero's revenue accounts directly from PWF. Also, I find it takes too long to just add a quick task to a project while on the phone with a client — I always end up keeping notes in a text file because it's faster/easier, and then creating tasks in PWF later when I have more time.
If it isn't ProWorkflow, I don't want it!
Comentarios: I implemented ProWorkflow over five years ago and would never go back. I couldn't be happier with the system and the support's responsiveness and helpfulness. It honestly makes a world of difference. Even though we've had ProWorkflow for some time now, I've made it a mission to continually learn as much as I can about PWF to leverage everything we can that makes sense for Rev One (my company), and it's been fantastic. We've become significantly more efficient because of it. I couldn't be happier with PWF.
Puntos a favor:
Data input and how it translates to reporting. Seeing data and real-time Job progress on all levels (product production status, burn rate, profitability, etc.)How easy it is to use and figure out. If you don't know how to do something or if a feature exists, you get the answer from support in less time that you think. This system is easy to grow with.
Contras:
There are little things here and there that are more about my preference that I'd like to see, but does not hinder me in any way and is more about user experience. Not even worth bringing up because it may not be relevant enough to the majority. I'm too happy with the system to complain about anything, to be honest.
A solid platform for the money
Comentarios: The experience has been fine but not great. I can't say it has done a lot to make our processes better outside of having job numbers that people can track to. That said, it hasn't been bad enough to change platforms and the team really relies on it.
Puntos a favor:
We evaluated a lot of platforms and ultimately selected ProWorkFlow. We have been with the platform for over five years so it has worked solidly enough to continue on with it. It's functionality covers the basics and yet has some customization built into it. The best feature is the search function for finding archived projects. The support team is excellent.
Contras:
ProWorkFlow has been really slow to roll out new features. In many ways it feels like the platform was left behind by other more progressive platforms. The two biggest cons of the platform is that it is difficult for people to enter time sheets - ProWorkFlow has tried to provide lots of options for doing so but in the end it is overwhelming for employees to find a specific project and a specific task and then log their time. The second issue is that once you build schedules you can't export them in a client ready/friendly version with certain tasks hidden and all of it formatted nicely. We find ourselves rebuilding schedules in Excel for every project.
Invaluable tool for our business, we love it!
Comentarios: We work with PWF multiple times a day, every day. We have seen continued commitment to always making the product better. We rely (without worry) on this tool, and it helps us manage and grow our business
Puntos a favor:
Simple but robust, does everything we need from time tracking, project/task management and assignment to invoicing
Contras:
Might not have been the coolest looking option to start with but has gotten steadily better, but regardless, the functionality is the key and it doesn't disappoint
Alternativas consideradas:
Straight to the point solution
Comentarios: Overall, a great solution that cuts through the noise for you in the already-crazy world of project management with great value for money as well.
Puntos a favor:
- Great support for Agile sprints, you can tell that the Agile methodology was thought of in the product's design, offering so many tools and features that enable working on sprints and other fast-paced projects. - Nice Milestone and Kanban visualisation as well. As I said earlier, points your attention to the most important thing to note; straight to the point. - Great value for money too.
Contras:
- Not great support for all invoicing scenarios; that would be useful to integrate into some projects that perhaps require follow-on funding or fractional and/or incremental payments. - It doesn't have great support for extra-platform communication with colleagues and third parties that are outside the platform, this could be useful when interfacing with clients who may not be registered users
