--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite gracias a Capterra Argentina. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Argentina 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software para captura de datos](/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) > [Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite](/software/192454/research-manager) # Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/192454/research-manager Página: 1 de 6\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) > Añadir valor a los datos. Research Manager ofrece una plataforma de investigación en la que la administración de procesos y la recolección de datos están integradas. > > Veredicto: 118 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.2/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite? Todas las investigaciones y profesionales en ciencias de la vida y ensayos clínicos ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.2/5** | 118 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Cloud9-Software - **Ubicación**: Deventer, Países Bajos - **Constitución**: 2013 ## Contexto comercial - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Idiomas admitidos**: alemán, inglés, neerlandés - **Países disponibles**: Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Belice y 204 más ## Funcionalidades - Captura de imagen - Captura distribuida - Captura electrónica de datos - Captura remota de datos - Clasificación de documentos - Conforme con HIPAA - Conformidad con 21 CFR Parte 11 - Creación de informes/análisis - Digitalización de documentos - Diseño de pruebas - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Gestión de formularios - Gestión de inventarios - Gestión de la conformidad - Gestión de pacientes - Gestión financiera - Historia clínica electrónica/informatizada - Importación y exportación de datos - Programación - Registro de auditoría - Selección de pacientes - Supervisión de pacientes - Third-Party Integrations ## Integraciones (en total: 10) - AFAS Software - Clue - ExactSpent - Fitbit - Freestyle Solutions - Polar - Samsung SDS - Wahoo Trace - Whoop - Zwift ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Software para captura de datos](https://www.capterra.com.ar/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Software para captura de datos](https://www.capterra.com.ar/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) - [Software de gestión de ensayos clínicos](https://www.capterra.com.ar/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [Sistemas de entrada de datos](https://www.capterra.com.ar/directory/30543/data-entry/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Florence eBinders](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/200364/florence-ebinders) — 4.5/5 (83 reviews) 2. [Castor EDC](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/143532/castor-edc) — 4.7/5 (204 reviews) 3. [ShareCRF](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/1031214/sharecrf) — 4.8/5 (44 reviews) 4. [Flex Databases platform](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/124010/flex-databases-platform) — 4.5/5 (13 reviews) 5. [TrialKit](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/149821/clinical-studio) — 4.5/5 (35 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Excellent software" — 5.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *2 de septiembre de 2023* | Hospital y atención sanitaria | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Can exchange data with other research teams, even those working on projects at different trial sites.Provides the ability for electronic signatures, making it simpler to get informed approval from study participants and record it. > > **Puntos en contra**: Time consuming when transferring large data set from the application ----- ### "Descent EDC" — 4.0/5 > **Noudjoum** | *24 de junio de 2026* | Productos farmacéuticos | Valoración de la recomendación: 6.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I liked the ease of use of it, the validation steps were easy and not too much complainte from the sites about data entry. The reporting is good. > > **Puntos en contra**: The roles \! They are all prédéfined in the system and cannot be customized, the query management is not convenient, and the customer service is in Rurope which made it difficult for urgent matters. > > I run three studies on it and the three of them run smoothly. Data entry was easy, data validation was easy too. The lock and data extraction were also straight forward. ----- ### "User-friendly system with potential for improvement" — 3.0/5 > **Marta** | *25 de junio de 2026* | Hospital y atención sanitaria | Valoración de la recomendación: 5.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: What I liked most about ResearchManager is that, from a monitor’s perspective, the system is quite intuitive and easy to navigate. The layout is clear and logical, which makes it relatively easy to find the necessary information. > > **Puntos en contra**: From a monitor’s perspective, the weakest point is that SDV can only be performed for closed visits, and only at the page level rather than for individual data points. In other systems, I have seen a more practical solution where each data point has a default status of “SDV not performed”, which can then be changed to “SDV performed” or “SDV not OK”. If “SDV performed” is selected and the site subsequently changes the entered data, the status automatically changes to “Data changed after SDV”. In my opinion, this functionality greatly facilitates monitoring and the tracking of all data changes. Another problematic aspect is the lack of possibility to raise queries in empty visits. In such cases, I have to contact the site separately by email and provide screenshots from the eCRF to indicate the missing data. It would also be very helpful if the query status were clearly visible, i.e. whether a query has already been addressed and closed or whether it still requires action. Currently, it is only visible that a query has been raised for a given parameter, but the actual status is not clear. In addition, in the query list, it would be very useful to see the specific queries linked to specific parameters, rather than only the sections in which the queries were raised. If there are many parameters and several queries, it is easy to overlook one of them. > > Overall, my experience has been positive. I find the system quite intuitive and easy to work with, but I think some improvements, especially in SDV and query management, could make it even better :) ----- ### "Easy of use in multicenter trials" — 5.0/5 > **Mikko** | *24 de junio de 2026* | Hospital y atención sanitaria | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Everything in order and in the same place. Easy to access form anywhere and esay to learn how to use. Makes performing a trial a lot easier. > > **Puntos en contra**: The automatic query, when missed filling a required field- would be nicer to remind that nort all required fields are filled yet, do you really want to "save as complete"? > > I use it regularly in a multicenter- trial as a head of corelab. Although all the parties involved are located in different countries, this no longer makes any difference. ----- ### "Efficient Clinical Research Management Platform with Strong Workflow Capabilities" — 4.0/5 > **Mateusz** | *11 de junio de 2026* | Investigación | Valoración de la recomendación: 6.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The platform helps centralize study management activities in one place, improving collaboration between research teams. I particularly appreciated the document management functionality, workflow support, and the ability to track study progress efficiently. The system promotes better organization and transparency across research projects. > > **Puntos en contra**: The user interface can feel somewhat complex for first-time users, and some advanced functions are not immediately intuitive. Additional customization options for reports and dashboards would be beneficial. The initial setup and onboarding process may require dedicated training. > > Overall, my experience with Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite has been positive. The platform provides a comprehensive environment for managing research activities and helps streamline administrative and operational tasks. While there is a learning curve, the benefits in terms of organization, compliance support, and workflow efficiency outweigh the challenges. It is a valuable solution for research organizations seeking to improve study management processes. ----- Página: 1 de 6\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/192454/research-manager) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Datos estructurados