--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Juro? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Juro gracias a Capterra Argentina. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Juro - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Argentina 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de gestión de contratos](/directory/30078/contract-management/software) > [Juro](/software/167130/juro) # Juro Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/167130/juro Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/167130/juro?page=2) > Gestión de contratos habilitada por IA, diseñada para los negocios modernos. > > Veredicto: 47 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.8/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Juro? Equipos legales, de ventas, RR. HH. y operaciones. Muchos clientes se encuentran en etapa de crecimiento y tienen empresas de gran tamaño. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.8/5** | 47 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.7/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Juro - **Ubicación**: London, RU - **Constitución**: 2016 ## Contexto comercial - **Público objetivo**: 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: alemán, checo, danés, español, finés, francés, húngaro, inglés, irlandés, italiano, neerlandés, noruego, polaco, portugués, ruso, sueco, ucraniano - **Países disponibles**: Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belice, Bermudas, Bielorrusia, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Bélgica, Canadá, Chequia, Chipre, Ciudad del Vaticano y 95 más ## Funcionalidades - Almacenamiento de documentos - Búsqueda de texto completo - Búsqueda/filtro - Captura de documentos - Colaboración en equipo - Control de procesos de aprobación - Control de versiones - Controles o permisos de acceso - Firma electrónica - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Herramientas de colaboración - Modelos personalizables - Plantillas prediseñadas - Seguimiento de la conformidad - Third-Party Integrations - Uso compartido de archivos ## Integraciones (en total: 11) - Google Drive - Greenhouse - HubSpot CRM - Okta - Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Sales Cloud - Slack - Workday Financial Management - Workday HCM - Workday Talent Management - Zapier ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Software de gestión de contratos](https://www.capterra.com.ar/directory/30078/contract-management/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Software de gestión de contratos](https://www.capterra.com.ar/directory/30078/contract-management/software) - [Software de gestión documental](https://www.capterra.com.ar/directory/30063/document-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Deel](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/205015/deel) — 4.9/5 (4314 reviews) 2. [Docusign](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/121506/Docusign) — 4.7/5 (9504 reviews) 3. [Adobe Acrobat](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/1012240/adobe-acrobat-dc) — 4.7/5 (4263 reviews) 4. [ContractSafe](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/153712/contractsafe) — 4.8/5 (186 reviews) 5. [PandaDoc](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/131735/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1260 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Juro Evaluation" — 4.0/5 > **Bob** | *9 de septiembre de 2026* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I liked Juro’s intuitive interface and streamlined contract management workflow. It made creating, reviewing, approving, and organizing contracts more efficient, while keeping everything centralized and easy to access. > > **Puntos en contra**: Although Juro’s interface was intuitive and its contract management workflow was streamlined, some advanced features and customization options could have been more flexible. Certain processes occasionally required extra steps or manual work, which reduced efficiency. > > My overall experience with Juro was positive. I found its interface intuitive and its contract management workflow streamlined and efficient. Juro made it easy to create, review, approve, and organize contracts while keeping everything centralized and accessible. ----- ### "Great contract tool" — 4.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *8 de agosto de 2025* | Hospital y atención sanitaria | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Juro makes contract creation and management feel intuitive and collaborative. In particular the contract based editor is great - it’s much easier to use than clunky Word-based workflows. I liked how easy it was to standardise contracts, collect approvals, and keep everything in one place without having to constantly jump between tools. It really helped reduce legal bottlenecks and gave our ops team better visibility and control. > > **Puntos en contra**: Personally, the pricing was a challenge for us, especially as a growing company with evolving priorities. While the features are solid, it became difficult to justify the cost when we were reassessing our tech stack. Some of the reporting felt a bit limited too - we would’ve liked more flexible analytics around contract statuses etc. > > Overall, Juro was a great solution for simplifying and speeding up our contract workflows. It’s well-designed, user-friendly, and clearly built with operations and legal teams in mind. We still use it for some planning templates, which speaks to how useful the platform is – but ultimately, we had to step away from it due to budget constraints. If pricing aligns with your stage and needs, it’s a very strong option. ----- ### "Something good but major flaw" — 3.0/5 > **Terho** | *12 de abril de 2024* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 2.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Pretty easy to use and contract negotiation part functions well. > > **Puntos en contra**: It has major flaws concerning signing procedure. Attachments are not legally part of the contract since they are not merged as attachments to actual signed contract. And you can change attachments after signing. This has caused major issues with the customers. ----- ### "A solid choice for contract management" — 5.0/5 > **Jesseica** | *8 de agosto de 2026* | Propiedad inmobiliaria comercial | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Juro's document automation and e-signature features are pretty solid, saving us a lot of time and reducing errors in our contracts. We've seen a noticeable decrease in contract review time once we rolled it out to the team. > > **Puntos en contra**: I'd say the one thing that took a bit to figure out was the custom field setup, but once I got the hang of it, it works well enough. Not a huge deal, but sometimes the UI gets a bit cluttered with all the options. > > I've been using Juro regularly and overall, it's been a solid choice for our contracting processes. The platform's intuitive interface makes it easy to navigate, and I appreciate the flexibility it offers in terms of customizing agreements and workflows to suit our specific needs. ----- ### "Allows me to avoid converting contract drafts into a jumbled email chain" — 5.0/5 > **Brion** | *26 de enero de 2026* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Mainly, I use Juro for drafting and reviewing contract versions, sending those versions as well as having them signed in a single application rather than constantly jumping back and forth between MS Word documents and emails. On an everyday basis I am working on Juro making small tweaks to contract language, requesting comments from team members via tags and sending the final versions of contracts for signature in a single application. What I like about Juro is I can clearly see which part of the process has stalled rather than having to guess who still needs to look at it. > > **Puntos en contra**: Editing more complex contracts can sometimes be somewhat restrictive, particularly if I need to do some extremely detailed formatting of that contract. Also, I had to spend more time than I anticipated cleaning up, editing and moving all of our current templates into the new system. Although some of the functionality in Juro was incredibly powerful, it was not always immediately apparent until I had spent enough time using the product. > > Juro significantly reduces the amount of "back and forth" and version confusion that occurred previously with contracts being created and managed through emails and shared drive systems. That results in reduced delays, as well as significantly less mental overhead (or stress) when managing many different contracts simultaneously. ----- Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/167130/juro?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.ar/software/167130/juro) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Datos estructurados