Opiniones de IBM Clinical Development

Sobre IBM Clinical Development

IBM Clinical Development es una única plataforma escalable en la nube que permite a los profesionales de investigaciones clínicas diseñar y gestionar ensayos.

Descubre más sobre IBM Clinical Development

Puntos a favor:

No disponible

Contras:

No disponible

Valoraciones de IBM Clinical Development

Evaluación media

Facilidad de uso
4,3
Atención al cliente
3,7
Funcionalidades
4,5
Relación calidad-precio
4,3

Probabilidad de recomendación

7/10

IBM Clinical Development tiene una valoración global de 4,3 estrellas sobre 5 según las 4 opiniones de usuarios de Capterra.

Filtrar opiniones (4)

Calificación del producto

Calificación del producto

Países

Países

Uso

Ordenar por

¿Ha utilizado IBM Clinical Development antes?

Comparte tu experiencia con otros compradores de software.

Filtrar opiniones (4)

Rosemary D.
EE. UU.
Ha utilizado el software durante: No especificado
Fuente de la reseña

IBM Clinical Development

5,0 hace 5 años

Comentarios: This EDC is very user-friendly and allows for easy view of which pages are pending/reviewed/monitored. Logline options for Adverse Events, Concomitant Medications and Drug dosing allow for simple corrections and quick review of any changes required.

Susan H.
Principal en EE. UU.
Productos farmacéuticos, Trabajador autónomo
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

IBM Clinical Development Software Performs

4,0 hace 5 años

Comentarios: I have used IBM Clinical Development for 6+years. It has very good functionality, offers lots of flexibility and is easy for the sites and CRAs. The system offers a modular approach, so you can select (and pay for) only the modules you want. On the downside, some of the modules are must haves and you have to pay for them when other systems include them in the base fee. The system really requires a programmer to set-up the studies and to be able to utilize all the functionality, and the customer support can be extremely slow. The reporting functionality is poor unless you purchase the reporting module, which is expensive. However, the programmers can program reports using the exports, so there is a way around reporting, these reports would just not be in the system for the users. The fees associated with the use of the software are high.

Puntos a favor:

features, functionality, ease of use by end users

Contras:

reporting features, necessity of needing a programmer to set-up, costs, user support

Usuario verificado
Director, Software Development en India
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Hospital y atención sanitaria, 10.000+ empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Effective EDC solution for Phase 1 and 4 clinical trials

4,0 el año pasado

Puntos a favor:

Great Electronic Data Capture features Cost effective Many standard reports available

Contras:

Not effective on large clinical studies using IBM CD

Clyde A.
Research Associate II en EE. UU.
Biotecnología, 1.001-5.000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Source of truth

4,0 el año pasado

Comentarios: I used it to submit my assay results, review analysts results and double-check data reports

Puntos a favor:

It works although it's old and clunky and feels like windows 95 level technology. Using IBM Clinical Development allowed us to track assay performance, analytical reports and pretty much anything that was data related in the lab

Contras:

It's old and because it is so deeply rooted in your lab environment you dont really have the choice to explore competitors without losing a lot of money on sunk cost. Also, any time something needed to be validated, our life would get really hard